LIVE · TYPE 26 FRIGATE
Programme Intelligence · Built for Defence

Always know
your gate position.

A living nervous system for your programme. CI test results, traceability graph, and gate readiness connected in real time, automatically. Deployed on your infrastructure, inside your security boundary. No data leaves your environment.

INGEST
SYS-REQ-001.docx
REQUIREMENT QUEUED
SAF-001.pdf
SAFETY QUEUED
FMEA-001.xlsx
ANALYSIS QUEUED
TST-002.docx
TEST QUEUED
VAL-002.pdf
VALIDATION QUEUED
INTELLIGENCE
GAP ANALYSISIDLE
CHANGE IMPACTIDLE
DEF STAN MAPPERIDLE
GSN GENERATORIDLE
22ARTEFACTS
51LINKS
14APPROVED
2GAPS
3SUSPECT
84%COVERAGE
68%
APPR 64% REVW 18% DRFT 13% GAP 5%
ARTEFACTS
LINKS
GAPS DETECTED
APPROVED
SUSPECT LINKS
GATE READINESS
Where defence programmes fail

Six operational failures that compound into programme risk.

All are visible continuously. Current tooling surfaces them at the gate, when the cost of fixing them is highest.

01

A requirement changes. Downstream test coverage is now unknown.

Engineers manually trace what needs retesting, if they trace it at all. Gaps surface at CDR. By then rework is measured in schedule weeks.

02

Gate readiness is assembled in the week before the review.

No continuous view of approved vs. open artefacts or traceability coverage. CDR readiness is a manually compiled snapshot that is already out of date when it reaches the board.

03

Traceability matrices fall behind the moment a change is committed.

RTMs in spreadsheets or DOORS exports are static the moment they are generated. The record presented at review reflects the programme as it stood when someone last exported it.

04

No single view across contractors and sub-contractors.

Each contractor holds their own DOORS module. Nobody has a consolidated view of programme state across the supply chain. Integration gaps surface at system-level review, when the cost of fixing them is at its highest.

05

Safety artefacts are approved without linked evidence.

Under schedule pressure, approvals go through without test evidence attached. The deficiency stays hidden until a SQEP assessor or gate reviewer checks the link manually. By that point it is already on the critical path.

06

Change requests are raised, then the downstream impact is left to chance.

A CR is approved and the source artefact is updated. The downstream tests, design outputs, and evidence documents that now need re-verification go unidentified. Engineers find out when they check manually, or they miss it entirely.

The platform

A living intelligence layer across every artefact, link, and gap.

Every change propagates immediately to connected artefacts and the gate readiness score.

GRAPH ENGINE

Live programme graph

Every artefact is a node. Every dependency, verification link, and evidence chain is an edge. State changes propagate in real time. No manual refresh. No stale snapshots.

CHANGE IMPACT

Downstream impact before the change is committed

Select any node and describe a proposed change. MAETRIX returns severity-coded findings for every affected downstream artefact before any edit is made to the programme record.

AI AGENTS

Four intelligence agents, each exhaustive

Gap Analysis, Requirement Quality, DEF STAN / JSP clause mapping, and GSN assurance case generation. Each covers the full programme. Results on first run.

GATE READINESS

Continuously computed gate readiness score

Approved artefact coverage, open gaps, safety nodes without evidence, and suspect links factored into a single score against your target gate. Updated on every state change.

SUSPECT LINKS

Automatic suspect link propagation

When an upstream artefact changes state, every verification and evidence link downstream is immediately flagged suspect. Nothing silently passes a gate on stale coverage.

AUDIT TRAIL

Immutable state history on every node

Every approval, rejection, and edit is timestamped and attributed. Gate reviewers and auditors see exactly who changed what, and when, without leaving the graph.

MULTI-CONTRACTOR

Cross-contractor programme visibility

Nodes and edges span organisational boundaries. Prime, sub-contractors, and IPTs see the same live state without sharing systems or duplicating data across programmes.

SECOND-PERSON REVIEW

Enforced two-person integrity at every gate

No artefact can be self-approved. MAETRIX enforces a second-person rule at node and gate level, with reviewer identity captured in the audit record.

RTM EXPORT

Requirements traceability matrix on demand

Generate a full RTM from the living intelligence layer at any point in the programme lifecycle. Columns, coverage, and gap flags are computed from current state, always reflecting the programme as it stands now.

CI INTEGRATION

Test results feed the graph automatically

Connect your CI pipeline in one step. Every test run updates node health on the programme graph in real time. Pass, fail, partial. If something fails, downstream artefacts are flagged immediately so the team knows what is at risk before anyone has to ask.

Defence context

The structural controls UK defence acquisition requires.

Requirements your SQEP assessor will check. Built into the platform, enforced at system level, independent of process discipline.

DEF STAN 00-056
DEF STAN 00-055
JSP 520
JSP 440
DEF STAN 05-138

Second-person approval

The artefact creator's approval carries zero weight on their own work. A second named individual is required at system level, independent of process discipline and seniority, with identity captured in the audit record.

Suspect link detection

When a node changes, every connected link is automatically flagged suspect. Engineers must re-confirm each one against the updated content before it is trusted again. Unconfirmed links are visible to the whole team.

Mandatory transition rationale

Moving any artefact to In Review or Approved requires a written justification. The rationale is stored in version history with a full snapshot, visible on screen and part of the permanent record.

Gate baseline locking

A locked baseline is a point-in-time snapshot of the full programme graph: every node, every link, every maturity state. The evidence artefact for CDR, PDR, or SRR. Irrecoverable by design.

Change request workflow

Once frozen, any edit to an artefact requires a raised and approved change request. Every unlock is traced to its CR reference. The record is complete from start to finish.

Immutable audit log

Every state change, approval, and rationale is cryptographically chained. When the gate comes, the record is already there. It was written as the programme ran.

DOORS + MAETRIX

DOORS stores requirements. MAETRIX computes programme state.

Most programmes are contractually locked into DOORS. The rest of the programme state lives in spreadsheets, shared drives, and email threads. MAETRIX runs above all of it, adding the intelligence layer none of them were designed to provide.

Capability IBM DOORS Next MAETRIX
Requirements authoring and module management
Suspect link detection on node change
Configuration baseline snapshots
Second-person approval workflow
Live cross-programme graph with gap visualisation
Automated change impact analysis across all downstream artefacts
Continuously computed gate readiness score
AI gap analysis across full programme
DEF STAN / JSP clause mapping per requirement
GSN assurance case generation
Immutable audit log with cryptographic chain
Deployment

Your infrastructure. Your boundary.

MAETRIX runs on your servers. Nothing leaves your network. No cloud dependency, no third-party data processing, no egress by design.

ON-PREMISE

Deployed inside your programme environment. Operates entirely within your existing security boundary with no external dependencies at runtime.

IL2 / IL3 READY

Architecture designed for IL2 and IL3 environments. Air-gap deployment available for programmes with stricter classification requirements.

JSP 440 ALIGNED

Data handling, access control, and audit logging aligned to JSP 440. No third-party data processing without explicit programme approval.

Early access

Looks interesting?
Let us know.

No commitment. We're mapping where the problem is felt most and who we build with first.

We'll be in touch. No commitment, no sales process.